Article by http://www.Notebookbattery.Gr/ : A federal jury happening the Apple-Samsung glasses case delivered a assorted verdict Friday.
The panel ruled with the intention of various Samsung products infringed on two patents with the intention of Apple had sued more than happening its newest patent glasses case and found compensation on a third patent, awarding extra than $119.6 million happening compensation. However, it found Apple did not infringe on two other patents and as well awarded Samsung $158,400, aphorism Apple infringed on a Samsung patent.
The jury found all accused Samsung phones infringed on the at the outset patent by the side of circulation, the ’647 “quick-links” patent, but the diplomacy did not infringe on two others interrelated to universal search and background harmonization. Designed for the ’721 “slide-to-unlock” patent, it ruled a little Samsung products infringed, while others did not.
Designed for a fifth patent, the authority had ruled with the intention of Samsung’s products infringed on the Apple patent, and the jury dogged with the intention of infringement was wanton.
Meanwhile, the panel ruled with the intention of Apple violated single of two Samsung patents with the intention of the company had countersued more than, but ruled the infringement was not wanton and awarded merely the $158,400.
A discrepancy on the verdict form, however, agency the panel bidding maintain to approach back on Monday to elucidate the verdict. (see updates underneath.)
The verdict was reached subsequent to three chock-full days of planning, with a retired IBM question part executive serving to the same extent the foreman of the four-man, four-woman jury.
Apple had been seeking $2.2 billion happening compensation, while Samsung argued with the intention of it to be paid by the side of a large amount $38 million otherwise so, not with the intention of it held it infringed Apple’s patents happening the at the outset place. It was as well seeking vis-а-vis $6 million from Apple happening its countersuit.
The $119.6 million is as well far fewer than Apple got happening its final glasses case opposed to Samsung, everywhere two juries happening the same courtroom awarded virtually $1 billion happening compensation. With Samsung continuing to put on ground happening the market–and courts so far having been unwilling to order its products be present altered otherwise taken inedible the market–a hot glasses case can be present made with the intention of Samsung has already outflanked Apple happening the ongoing permissible battle.
And of program, both sides bidding likely ask authority Lucy Koh to group aside the newest verdict and, failing with the intention of, bidding appeal the jury’s verdict.
With the intention of thought, Apple praised the ruling.
“We are indebted to the jury and the encourage designed for their service,” Apple told Re/code. “Today’s ruling reinforces I beg your pardon? Courts around the planet maintain already found: With the intention of Samsung willfully stole our ideas and uninspired our products. We are fighting to defend the fast product with the intention of goes into beloved products like the iPhone, which our employees bestow their lives to crafty and delivering designed for our customers.”
Representatives of Samsung and Google were not without delay untaken designed for comment. However Google appeared to approach publicized a winner; it had agreed to provide indemnity to Samsung with regard to two patents by the side of circulation, both of which the jury ruled were not infringed.
The jury heard extra than 50 hours of testimony happening all, to the same extent well to the same extent opening and finishing statements.
Keep posted, 6:05 p.M.: Apple has identified single effect found to infringe designed for which thumbs down compensation were awarded; authority Koh says the jury bidding be present asked to elucidate with the intention of intention. Certain the tardiness of the hour, the jury bidding maintain semi an hour tonight otherwise it bidding maintain to approach back on Monday.
6:30 p.M.: The jury decides it would instead settle things subsequent to the weekend, so they bidding be present back by the side of 9 a.M. Monday.
Samsung’s outside attorney, John Quinn, declined to comment on the compensation judgment, noting the verdict is not yet final certain the discrepancy still to be present addressed by the jury. Google has as well declined to comment.
没有评论:
发表评论